Skip to main content
Out $marting the Interactive WhiteBoard. By Kenneth Willers

The transformation to 21st Century instruction is being dominated by the integration of interactive technologies. Over the past few years, classrooms, entire schools and school districts have been investing thousands of dollars into interactive technologies for classroom adoption. The most common device being installed in classrooms all over the globe is the interactive whiteboard.

The instructional benefits of the interactive whiteboard have been well documented and highly praised by many classroom teachers. The ability of a teacher or a student to interact with the classroom whiteboard, to view, manipulate and demonstrate content, to browse the internet with a single tap, to record lessons for web posting and to interact with educational software that engages the student, are all features of the interactive whiteboard that makes its use in the learning environment a valuable tool for 21st Century instruction.

So, why don’t all schools take advantage of this innovative technology? The answer: the prohibitive cost of purchase and installation.

If only there was a way to out$mart the Interactive WhiteBoard and still benefit from its type interactive technology. There is...

The School of the Madeleine recently invested in a tablet device for interactive technology—the iPad. Students and teachers both have the experience of interacting with technology in a manner that is engaging and educationally beneficial. But, this article is not about the iPad...it is about interactive technology for instructional purposes. Let me explain, how the iPad plays a role.

The iPad presented a wonderful challenge to the Madeleine as we were considering the purchase of interactive whiteboards. With the iPad, did we need an interactive whiteboard? Although the individual student or teacher could interact with a device, the ability to share that experience for instructional purposes with the whole class, like the interactive whiteboard would permit, was eluding us. Once Apple updated the iOS for the iPad and updated their software for the Apple TV these two system enhancements opened up tremendous opportunity.

The iPad in conjunction with Apple TV is able to mirror its device to any monitor or projector that has an HDMI input port. The magical piece of this feature is that the iPad is now able to mirror its screen wirelessly. This capability enables the teacher to display any content or App from anywhere in the classroom. This mirrored image can then be transmitted to a flat panel television connected to Apple TV or projected onto the classroom’s existing whiteboard simply through a projection device connected to Apple TV. Since interaction takes place through the iPad-no interactive whiteboard is needed.

But this is not all, depending on the number of iPads at the teacher’s disposal, this feature creates multiple interactive whiteboards in one classroom. Every teacher and student who is using an iPad, has the ability to project their device and interact with their content via the Apple TV by simply tapping the Airplay button on the iPad. Imagine having the ability to demo something on to the whiteboard via the iPad and then asking students to share their content with the class with a simple tap of a button. No cables, no special software and no need to be up in the front of the classroom. Students can interact and share their content right from their desktops. Now, that is Smart. What else is smart is the cost savings.

Out$marting the Interactive WhiteBoard might mean thinking differently about the type of mobile technology the school invests in for student use. For us at the Madeleine, with the integration of the iPad the need for an interactive whiteboard is diminished. But, the iPad discussion is for another article. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Resources for STEM

Please find the following links for STEM/STEAM resources: http://www.theatlantic.com/ sponsored/chevron-stem- education/the-jobs-of-today/ 196/#   https://www.nsf.gov/ attachments/117803/public/Xc-- Linking_Evidence--Fairweather. pdf http://www.aaai.org/Papers/ Symposia/Spring/2007/SS-07-09/ SS07-09-022.pdf http://opas.ous.edu/Work2009- 2011/InClass/Bybee-Integrated% 20STEM%20Plan.pdf http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ ejournals/JOTS/v36/v36n1/ rockland http://youtu.be/5GWhwUN9iaY . STEM? http://youtu.be/biWQZlUl-vE   Tools for Change  http://youtu.be/Ldf01YYtImY   Why STEM Education http://www.youtube.com/ playlist?list=PL7ck4NnpyNff_ F653mGHRf4EDwuS6IQfJ . Great videos about STEM ed http://youtu.be/SA3EPf9tsI8   Gaming Challenge.  http://www.stemedcoalition.org  Coalition http://www.pbs.org/teachers/ stem/  Teachers Organization on PBS http://mobile.nytimes.com/ 2013/12/08/opinion/sunday/w...

Forget Textbooks--Discover the Well

Books and Wells by Ken Willers        O nce Upon A Time , there was a man who said he wanted to search for deep Wells. Before he set out to seek his desire he thought it would first be wise to consult all the great books that had been written on the subject of deep Wells. The man read many books on where to find Wells and the differences in depth that they possessed. One day while he was strolling casually along engrossed in his reading of Wells he failed to notice a large deep Well right in front of him. When he bumped into the deep Well his book flew from his hands and fell quite far into the deep recesses of the Well. The man quite upset at the loss frantically lowered a near by bucket to retrieve his book but his attempt was in vain. The man went away very sad that he lost his book for he thought, without his book, how could he ever hope to find a deep Well. Is this the type of learner today’s schools are manufacturing? Textbook dependent learn...

Teach the Child NOT the Subject

A story for everyone to read.  The Animal School  by George Reavis Once upon a time, the animals decided they must do something heroic to meet the problems of a “new world.” So they organized a school. They adopted an activity curriculum consisting of running, climbing, swimming, and flying. To make it easier to administer the curriculum, all the animals took all the subjects. The duck was excellent in swimming, in fact better than his instructor; but he made only passing grades in flying and was very poor in running, he had to stay after school and also drop swimming in order to practice running. This was kept up until his webfeet were badly worn and he was only average in swimming. But average was acceptable in school, so nobody worried about that except the duck. The rabbit started at the top of the class in running, but had a nervous breakdown because of so much make- up work in swimming. The squirrel was excellent in climbing until he developed frustra...